A rmative Action in a Competitive Economy
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider a model of endogenous human capital formation with competitively determined wages. In the presence of two distinguishable, but ex ante identical groups of workers, we show that discrimination is sustainable in equilibrium, even if the corresponding model with a single group of workers has a unique equilibrium. An a rmative action policy consisting of a quota may \fail" in the sense that there still may be equilibria where groups are treated di erently. However, the incentives to invest for agents in the discriminated group are improved by a rmative action if the initial equilibrium is the most discriminatory equilibrium in the model without the policy. The welfare e ects are ambiguous. We demonstrate that it is possible that the policy makes the intended bene ciaries worse o : even if the starting point is the most discriminatory equilibrium the expected payo may decrease for all agents in the target group.
منابع مشابه
The Political Economy of College Admissions¤y
A±rmative action in college admissions creates diversity by replacing marginal majority applicants with marginal minority applicants. Majority citizens' preferences over the level of diversity as well as the means of achieving it depend on their competitive positions in admissions. In a simple model of college admissions, we show that higher-ability majority citizens prefer a more diverse stude...
متن کاملDoes Affi rmative Action Reduce Eff ort Incentives ?
This paper analyzes the incentive eff ects of affi rmative action in competitive environments modeled as contest games. Competition is between heterogeneous players where heterogeneity might be due to past discrimination. Two policy options are analyzed that tackle the underlying asymmetry: Either it is ignored and the contestants are treated equally, or affi rmative action is implemented which...
متن کاملA Simple Theoretical Argument for Affi rmative Action
We consider a society jointly committed to ensuring equal opportunity and to increasing aggregate wealth but facing the vestiges of past discrimination manifested in a historically skewed distribution of social resources. Focusing on the problem of allocating the existing quantity of inputs, we contrast two policy instruments: redistributing resources in order to compensate for the effect of th...
متن کاملA rmative Action as an Implementation Problem
Existing a rmative action policies fail because they generate new undesirable equilibrium outcomes. This paper re-designs a rmative action policies from the implementation perspective. It shows that some simple combinations of unemployment insurance and employment subsidy can selectively eliminate undesirable equilibrium outcomes. This class of policies is also the cheapest among all e ective p...
متن کاملDoes Banning A¢rmative Action Harm College Student Quality?
Banning a¢rmative action from college admissions decisions cannot prevent an admissions o¢ce that cares about diversity from achieving it through channels other than the explicit consideration of race. We construct a model of college admissions where candidates from two groups with di¤erent average quali...cations compete for a ...xed number of seats. When an admissions o¢ce that cares both abo...
متن کامل